Gold’s unbeatable talent is taking half-decent people by surprise. The comedy writes itself.

Remember when Alex Jones was peddling water filters and supplements while scaring the dental crowns off his followers, then airdried food for doomsday preppers? At least he stayed in character. The products were supposedly designed to help his audience survive. Today’s civilisational panic grifters are less picky.

This is a real screenshot from Andrew Gold’s interview of a self-identified Jewish spy in Iran, discussing the catastrophic Muslim invasion of the West, suddenly interrupted halfway for a strange advert. Voila.

Barbarians are at the gates! Prepare to fight! But first, fight your wrinkles with this amazing face mask for men, using my promo code for a discount (not an actual quote, but close enough).

Comments were hilarious. Sad, tragic even, but hilarious at the same time.

They’re talking about resistance and a fight to the death (it’s real to them, unfortunately), to a guy trying to sell them an effeminate anti-wrinkles mask, as he poses wearing it. OK.

You may have no weapons, but you can always get a facial, as you consume endless content about a supposed invasion, designed solely to line the pockets of slimy grifters.

Imagine the pure psychosis of this poor woman, convinced that she will experience close combat with a street army of Muslim men, using household items or her bare hands. I feel sorry for her. While she waits, she can always address her wrinkles, at 15% off, as she praises the neo-Nazis who do flood the streets during riots, do damage property and do invade homes with the intent to kill, as they recently did in Northern Ireland.

Does Gold experience remorse?

Does he read the comments? Does he see the mental state his content plunges these people into and just not care? Would he care if his content specifically caused violence against a minority group, by someone believing themselves to be at war? No, he just wants the money.

When will people realise the grift, the lack of seriousness and accountability, while this is stochastic incitement?

Gold isn’t afraid of invasions, civilisational collapse or anything related. He is comfortable and expanding financially by riding the wave of anti-Muslim hysteria, milking the cow for as long as he can. When the cow dries up, he will reinvent himself again, focusing on whatever is profitable at that moment, drawing in a completely new audience.

Gold and the war on Iran

It is now the 26th of June. The war on Iran, which started in late February and was the most discussed geopolitical event of the year, seems to have ended. For five long months, Gold has not addressed the topic publicly, even once. Ironically, the impending global depression would have served his apocalyptic scenario – except he can’t possibly criticise Israel, even for starting this war, hence he simply pretended it wasn’t happening. He didn’t even publish tangential content on Iran, like the video screenshotted below.

He was in a bind – the war was unpopular even with neo-Nazis, like Restore voters and the Fuentes camp. Had he supported it, he would’ve been in the minority and his brand would’ve suffered. But he couldn’t criticise it either. In conclusion, Gold does not love Israel more than he loves his own pocket. He waited until the war officially ended to continue with his regular programming, painting Iran as a threat, removed from any present context. On the 14th of June, JD Vance signed the peace deal. Trump was to sign it on the 17th.

On the 15th, Gold uploaded his interview with the self-proclaimed spy, reiterating that the “Islamic Regime” might “take over the West”. Still, he doesn’t seem to have mentioned the 2026 war at all.

Then there was this post (the irony being lost on him – he was mentioning Iran’s infiltration while promoting an interview with a supposed spy that had infiltrated the Iranian regime, aka it’s OK when we do it):

Here’s how you can tell a person has no shame: their lies drop even at the most inappropriate moments.

As energy and fuel prices skyrocketed due to the strait of Hormuz being closed, courtesy of Israel’s war, Gold still saw fit to upload the following, claiming that “Net Zero policies” were responsible, and that this was on purpose, to kill off part of the population:

The entire world knew the cause of soaring prices in real time, yet he still had the audacity to blame environmental protection policies. Was he correct to presume ignorance and stupidity of his audience members? It appears he was. Obviously I didn’t read the entire comment section, but at a glance, skimming through it, the war was not mentioned – his followers’ brains operated in a vacuum.

The perversity of it all

This individual waited until Iran as a topic was safe to monetise again. As soon as the deal was signed, literally the next day, his speculative fearmongering went out to his crazed audience. He couldn’t even wait a week.

Iran was subjected to a war of aggression and prevailed, incurring huge loss of life and material damage. None of that matters to ghouls like Andrew Gold, who see anything monetisable as fair game – including inciting gratuitous hatred against a country that survived such events and is likely still burying its dead.

Gold is not a crazed Zionist either – or he would’ve supported the war all throughout. He is cold and calculating. While I am not a psychologist, I can, without armchair-diagnosing this individual, conclude that he doesn’t have much of a conscience (if any). It’s a strong statement to make, but warranted at this point.

Just as his thumbnail claims, you’re being played. By him, that is.

Jim Jones meets P.T. Barnum

Viewers may forget how Andrew Gold started his YouTube venture: by discussing cults and irrational, evidence-free beliefs, including those around imminent doom. In the year of our… many revenue streams, 2026, he sounds like the preacher from Poltergeist, reaching out to the sky in despair, as followers descended into the cave.

He keeps depicting apocalyptic scenes of civilisational collapse, “native Brits” disappearing (being outbred), an undefined invasion by an undefined army of Muslims and so forth. He keeps saying the so-called elites want to kill off the population.

Lo and behold, he needn’t stop there.

Akin to how he exploited the artificially-generated hatred towards Meghan Markle for 3 years, Gold is willing to monetise just anything, if it seems popular enough. Ergo this little ET gem, suggesting there is something sinister about presumed alien bodies being hidden from the general population of our planet, which is somehow “dark” (although if true, it wouldn’t affect anybody):

It seems he has run out of earthly apocalyptic scenarios, so the only place left to go is outer space.

The mere sight of him peddling alien conspiracy theories now, with a gaping mouth in the thumbnail (quite similar to a blow-up doll) is funny. He has stopped pretending to be serious – except the unwell people in his audience take him very seriously on some issues, ignoring the rest.

To be fair to him, the possibility of extra-terrestrial life is far more believable than the European caliphate he often mentions, where fascists are oppressed by Muslims and simultaneously by a “degenerate” far-left, somehow coexisting.

When it comes to Gold, poor taste is a euphemism. As usual, here is the complementary demonstration of clickbait using a very serious subject, this time real:

First off, the unnecessary editing of the predator’s face, assuming viewers may not know who he is and may click to find out. David Sullivan’s name is omitted in the title for the same reason. Secondly, “he did this to girls”. Did what? Point at them with a curvy arrow? Come one, come all, you won’t believe your eyes and ears.

If interested, people click anyway; baiting them with unknowns and sensationalism is a lack of respect for victims, turning the story into tabloid trash. It’s also a lack of respect for the audience – the assumption that viewers need or appreciate such theatrics, replicated frequently:

Repeat offender Tommy Robinson didn’t like the prison experience. He could have very easily avoided his latest stint, for disobeying a court order to stop defaming a teenager from a minority background. Some of his other convictions were for violence. Poor Tommy feels persecuted, but not persecuted enough to stop attacking people. That’s how he makes money after all.

Then there was a video about Madeleine McCann.

I am not pasting the thumbnail here, as this slimy creep saw fit to modify the child’s image to make it look unsettling, adding what appears to be blood to one of her eyes and discolouring half of her face. This is a grown man with a supposedly grown audience, who pretends to care about the safety of children, but did not afford this one child the dignity of her image not being turned into a horror sideshow artificially and unnecessarily. But he “cares about children” and discusses them “respectfully”. Children are content fodder to Gold, or he would care about child victims of war or genocide. He does not.

In the video screenshotted below, Gold opens by claiming there is a “shadowy cabal” creating the UK’s laws. It’s potentially what his guest argues (Gold does have a tendency to distort what his guests say, to sensationalise it).

First of all, sex offenders do go to prison if found guilty. I will admit that I haven’t watched the interview, stopping at Gold’s shadowy cabal introduction. Secondly, there is a clear problem with sex offences and the very low percentage that end up in court.

However, this individual seems to be implying that the law is being written in real time, by a shadowy cabal, while in reality, most of it consists of centuries of common law, statute law, precedents, interpretation rules etc. It is indeed very difficult to change, and passing new laws is a laborious and complicated process involving debates and opposing viewpoints.

Leave it to Mr. Beauty Mask here to oversimplify the gammon ignorant person’s understanding of the legal system, and you will see comments like this one:

This isn’t to say that governments don’t censor or oppress the population to suit certain interests, as we’ve seen with people protesting the genocide of the Palestinians. They certainly can and do. They do this instrumentally, when – again – it serves a specific purpose. To claim that the entire legal system is fashioned in real time by a cabal is just a lie. You can research; you can trace laws back to their origins and trace their evolution.

Gold’s guest, Black Belt Barrister, is someone I remember as grifting the Depp vs. Heard case in 2022. Here’s a look at newer content, where he exploits internet platform illiteracy and biased speculation to claim the following:

This was one video, apparently geo-blocked for some reason. The process involves automated moderation and it’s unknown what triggered it. It’s handled by bots. The Online Safety Act is still new and ambiguous. According to this guy it was a Labour intervention, to censor that specific video.

Reform UK have their own TV channel, GB News, which Farage is a shareholder of. They are heavily promoted by another culture war latrine, Talk TV. They speak freely whenever they want to, as egregiously as they want to. They even incite riots and nobody stops them. They are also given airtime by the mainstream media, to a degree that gives them legitimacy in the public arena. They are not being censored.

I am sick to death of grifters claiming that anything they can paint as potential censorship can become a cash cow, because most people simply don’t understand how internet platforms work.

Andrew Gold is platforming the worst of the worst – including Steve Laws, the neo-Nazi. The grifter depicted above is probably tame compared to other characters.

If you’ve read this far, you’re probably thinking Gold couldn’t possibly sink any lower, in terms of dishonesty, careless incitement to line his pockets and exploitation of his audience’s ignorance and poor mental health.

But he will always find a way to surprise you.