In European fascist ecosystems (where you can find anything from apex predators to roaches and maggots), the word traitor is widely circulated. Typically, it’s applied to those allowing the dilution of the ancestral blood through race mixing, as a result of immigration (Hitler was of the same opinion), and to leftists in general.

The traitor label is not applied, curiously, to those who kiss the bloated feet of sex offender (and overall seasoned criminal) Donald Trump – a man they revere, beckoning him to lay down the law in their beloved, and most of all sovereign countries.

At least that was the case until two days ago, when Nigel Farage, neglecting his duties as a member of Parliament, flew to the US to testify in Washington regarding the lack of free speech in the UK, which he claimed was on its way to becoming like North Korea, asking Trump to intervene, by pressuring the UK into changing its laws.

The censorship he referenced was, of course, just against the far-right, as in people inciting violence against minorities. He made no reference to the hundreds of peaceful protesters, many of them elderly, recently arrested while demonstrating and praying for the Palestinian genocide to end. Farage is not in favour of that type of free speech.

Coincidentally, he was also there to launch gutter channel GB News in the US (a few degrees of separation from phrenology and they’re eating the cats), which he is a shareholder of, profiting financially from its presumed success. It’s quite a feat for an outsider to get the attention of Congress in order to garner publicity for his financial venture.

Below are examples of Farage’s recent supplication of Trump to intervene in the UK’s internal affairs, namely for a foreign country to undermine the UK’s sovereignty, a prospect he normally balks at, as do his followers. Courtesy of Copilot again:

The star of Farage’s free speech circus was undoubtedly congressman Jamie Raskin, who succinctly listed all the reasons Farage was a hypocrite and impostor (apologies if I missed any):

  • Farage bans unfriendly journalists from Reform UK events, thus trying to keep the press from reporting freely;
  • Farage supported banning a peaceful protest, 700.000 strong, against the genocide in Gaza;
  • Farage’s fascist propaganda channel GB News (which again, he is a shareholder of) is allowed to operate freely;
  • Farage is appealing to the US, a country rated much lower in terms of freedom of speech in 2025 than the UK by analysts;
  • The US demonstrably stifles speech, peaceful protests and negative opinions on Trump, the latter resulting in civil servants being fired, akin to what happened under Stalin;
  • Farage expresses admiration for dictators like Putin, whose countries punish dissent against the establishment.

Hearing Jamie Raskin list these issues was cathartic, as the UK media never challenges Farage on these blatant contradictions.

Although there is substantial crossover between Reform voters and the Trump cult, British people in general didn’t take kindly to Farage’s appeal to foreign interference and pressure, if not coercion. He has been referred to as a traitor, on many platforms, ever since.

A correct use of the term, this time around.

“We’re fighting the globalists!”

In appearance, European fascists exude a strong desire for freedom from supranational structures (they all oppose the European Union); they oppose foreign influence in general. They despise most immigrants at a molecular level, invoking anything from skin colour to “funny-smelling” ethnic food. Fascists are all about the mystical powers of their ancestors, strong borders and immediate ethnic purges, should they reach power.

Above all, they oppose a nebulous group they term the globalists, seemingly trying to create a New World Order by eliminating borders, engineering race mixing and subordinating all countries to a central authority. The globalists is usually a dog whistle for an international Jewish cabal.

A contradiction? An immense and blatant one? Of course. But never mind, as they are so laden with contradictions they may just develop a hernia.

Below are some quotes from this year, of self-styled nationalists looking to Trump as a solver of the UK and Ireland’s “problems”. I don’t know why it comes across as so eerily similar to praying to Jesus (perhaps because it has just as much logic).

Dan Wootton (Outspoken, Ep. 15 – March 3 2025, 14:20)
“Britain is fast becoming an authoritarian state where any dissenting opinion is silenced. President @realDonaldTrump, I urge you to use your voice to call out Ofcom’s broadcast crackdown before it’s too late.”
Watch: https://www.youtube.com/c/Outspoken (start at 14:20)

The far-right has gained substantial ground over the last few years, stooping to levels not experienced in at least a decade. Violence, threats of violence and incitement are still dealt with legally, yet propagandists are free to brainwash the masses with lies and generalisations, equating entire ethnic groups with their worst elements, as if identical criminal conduct were unheard of among white native Brits. They are free to create panic and hatred, as well as outrage, and do so on a daily basis. They lie about the asylum seeking process all the time.

Laurence Fox & Calvin Robinson (Reclaim The Media – April 18 2025, 4:05)
“This is President Trump’s fight: Make British Speech Great Again. We’re looking to him to push back on defamation laws and Ofcom until they respect free speech.”
Watch: https://www.youtube.com/ReclaimTheMedia (go to 4:05)

I’m asking the obvious – how the hell is he supposed to make Ofcom change its policies? The methods Farage suggested a few months later, of course. In some people’s minds, Trump is able, through financial prowess, to dictate down to details how other countries deal with their internal affairs.

Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad livestream – May 2 2025, 38:40)
“Donald, we need you to speak up on cancel culture sweeping British universities. Your moral authority can pressure them to drop these woke policies and defend free discourse.”
Watch: https://www.youtube.com/SargonOfAkkad (jump to 38:40)

This is probably the funniest, as unless Carl Bejamin has been stuck in a well for the past year, he has seen reports on US students being kidnapped off the street, arrested and deported for as little as writing an op-ed in a college newspaper, in opposition to Israel’s extermination of the Palestinians. He has surely seen reports of Trump coercing universities, by withdrawing funding, into allowing departments to be shut down, their curriculum censored and supervisors installed to check that Trump’s desired narrative was not contradicted by any field of study. Just like in the old days of communism in Eastern Europe. Appealing to Trump to impose “free speech in universities” is beyond comical, if not grotesque.

Carl Benjamin must be equating the notion of “free speech” with “fascist speech”/ incitement against minorities. In fact, they all do.

Ben Scallan (The Long Game, Ep. 27 – May 3 2025, 22:10)
“Only a high-profile Trump tweet could shake the Taoiseach out of Dublin’s EU dogma and force real debate on housing and taxation.”
Listen: https://www.gript.ie/podcasts/ (Episode 27, 22:10)

I bet anyone would just shake in their boots after one of Trump’s tweets, especially the Irish prime minister, who is not known for holding back his and the country’s opinion on any matter, contentious as it may be. Ireland is possibly the bravest and most principled country in Europe at the moment.

Jason Osborne (The Long Game, Ep. 27 – May 3 2025, 35:50)
“If Trump publicly lambasts Brussels’ mandates, our government would have no choice but to reconsider the Northern Ireland Protocol.”
Listen: https://www.gript.ie/podcasts/ (Episode 27, 35:50)

The importance given to Trump’s communications, particularly tweets, most of which are rambling and unhinged, compared to actual legislation and decades-old agreements, painstakingly put together, raises Trump to the level of a world dictator of sorts.

It does appear, however, that overall this type of rhetoric is not very common in the UK and Ireland, even among the far-right, if this analysis is correct. Again, courtesy of Copilot:

Deep Dive into Fringe Networks: Calls for U.S. Intervention

After scouring 45 Irish far-right Telegram channels, dozens of Gab threads and several Discord servers frequented by self-styled UK/Irish nationalists, there are virtually no instances of on-record appeals for Donald Trump or any U.S. administration to “save us” or meddle in Brexit, Northern Ireland or Irish domestic affairs.

Telegram (Irish Far-Right)
Despite heavy anti-establishment and conspiracy framing—labeling Sinn Féin as “Sinn Féin/MI5 controlled colonial subjects” or mocking them with slogans like “Brits out, Africans in”—none of the channels analyzed ran posts urging Trump or the U.S. to intervene in Irish politics or the Northern Ireland Protocol.

Gab and Discord
Across the Gab boards and Discord servers monitored, contributors repurposed “America First” memes and echoed U.S. culture-war themes. Yet no thread or pinned post explicitly calls on the U.S. president to step in and dictate policy in Westminster, Stormont or Dublin.

Near-Miss: Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV)

The closest real-world example comes from a press release by the TUV’s Jim Allister, who praised Trump for threatening Ireland’s tax “special dispensation” and urged the UK government to emulate that U.S. pressure by rejecting the Northern Ireland Protocol:

“Yesterday Donald Trump called time on the special dispensation afforded the Republic of Ireland by the United States for tax purposes… As the United States requires the Republic to take on the normal responsibilities of statehood, it is important that the… United Kingdom should now do the same.”

I’m aware that this type of analysis is a hit and miss, as it didn’t detect the following inhabitant of Farage’s fur:

The video refers to Trump’s tariffs causing economic upheaval, companies pulling out of Ireland and the resulting poverty forcing the Irish establishment to reconsider its stance on social issues, as well as immigration and asylum seekers. Ireland, Sheridan reckoned, had not been very nice to Trump and Vance, and needed to be coerced, mafia-style, into adopting fascist policies.

That’s not entirely true. In 2015, he would refer to people who, I quote “put their hopes into something like Donald Trump” as severely misguided. He then realised, of course, how profitable the Trump train was, and has remained on the grift since. The change was very sudden, around the time of the presidential election in 2016, right when content creators were starting to make money by milking it. It was an overnight switch.

Every day? Jeez, I didn’t know that type of project could be completed so quickly; I should inform some engineers that the competition is truly scary.

Immigrants are making us poor; Trump is welcome to do so

The brand of populism embraced by Farage & ticks has always been fickle; it showed its true colours when they kept worshipping Trump and Musk, who further impoverished the most disadvantaged in their country, by cutting or eliminating funding for the following:

  • Meals for the homeless and elderly people in need;
  • Programs helping working families with childcare and early education;
  • Pediatric cancer research;
  • Programs for veterans, including mental health helplines;
  • A large affordable housing program worth 1 billion etc.

Meanwhile, Farage & fleas argue with their full chest, as a party line, that a country should look after its own citizens as a main priority. Yet they want the UK to emulate the US in its absolute hatred of the poor and vulnerable, at the same time.

On top of that, as seen above, they want the UK sanctioned by Trump directly if failing to comply with extortion-adjacent demands of legislative and cultural changes.

When does it click that poverty is a mere rhetorical instrument to them and they don’t care if poor people, or working people for that matter, live or die? What in the holy crack house are their supporters imbibing?

Enter the worshippers of the Great White. No, not this guy, though they might as well:

Just as dispossessed people were placated using religion in olden days, the myth of a world created to be dominated by whites has made a comeback. It gives meaning and purpose to those whose Stella cans might otherwise be thrown at the wife at 4 am.

Since wife beating isn’t a consequence-free solution to let out existential anger (one gets arrested nowadays), that anger has to go somewhere. Grandiosity must be restored. Meaning and purpose must be found for that aggression. But I digress.

The hypocrisy isn’t subtle in 2025

That might’ve been the case 10 or 20 years ago, as laws to criminalise certain types of protest and speech were creeping in, causing minor alarm within the general population, although the end result was predictable.

If conspiracy-minded, one might argue that measures are taken against the far-right on occasion, as in arrests over speech, to create an image of counterbalancing the draconian censorship of the left, such as protests against the extermination of the Palestinians.

On the far-right, only explicit incitement to violence seems to be criminalised, while the mainstream media promotes the agenda of Farage and his pond leeches, in more polite terms and impeccable suits, of course. On the left, even praying for the end of mass starvation of civilians is cause for arrest.

Farage, like the bloated would-be emperor he prostrates himself before, abhors such conduct – never mind he is part of the camp supporting a return to Christian morality (whatever that means to said camp; in all likelihood, nothing but a cliche). The peaceful protestors arrested in their hundreds nowadays count entire groups of church-attending pensioners. The morals they espouse in denouncing the genocide are Christian to the core.

Reality couldn’t be clearer in terms of the demagoguery and scam the far-right are perpetrating.