After the pounding he took from a swarm of neo-Nazis two months ago, for not caring enough about racial purity, the intellectual prostitute known as Andrew Gold must’ve realised the monetary potential of their engagement. Ergo the multiple videos based on the Great Replacement theory lately.

He was already portraying Muslims as a menace to the country, caking his incitement in ideological disagreements. His rhetorical bordello just needed a change of curtains (or a removal, rather). Today, neo-Nazis don’t just get a foot massage at his fine establishment; they get a happy ending. He’s one of the good ones.

For a few years, Gold had pretended to be centrist, rejecting extremism and indoctrination in any form (apart from Zionism, of course). He had created the façade of a politically moderate, anti-cult documentarian. The itch for clicks and money drove him increasingly to the right, using outrage baiting, then into the far-right. He has now arrived at the final bus stop – and there is no going back.

The Zionist strand of fascism is dying out

Predictably, far-right grifters are now only left with neo-Nazis for an audience. The surge of Zionist fascists after October of 2023 has faded. Chances are it was highly astroturfed. Comment sections used to burst with praises of Israel. Since the war on Iran at least, the bots have almost disappeared, including on channels owned by far-right rags like The Sun. There was a recent scandal involving hasbara propagandists suing the state of Israel over non-payment. That might explain the peace and quiet online, allowing actual people to voice their opinions. Support for the war, or for Israel for that matter, is close to 0.

Hasbara peddlers can keep on speaking, but who are they addressing? Who are they co-opting? Without the sensibilities of the liberals the impugn, who continue to see antisemitism everywhere and arrest peaceful protestors for opposing genocide, hasbarists would have no backing or grace from mainstream society.

Gold and his ilk must adapt now. They either fully embrace neo-Nazis to remain in business, or close the shutters. For Gold, who is Jewish, the grift is even more despicable. He embodies the stereotype of those who would “sell their grannies”.

Complete silence on Iran, while he blames autistic people for political extremism

It’s been a month since the war of aggression on Iran was started, by the greatest threats to world peace, aka the US and Israel. Not only is it in the news 24/7, in some form; this war contains several elements Gold routinely focuses on: Muslims, Israel, Donald Trump and the so-called clash of civilisations invoked by the far-right. Gold’s silence for a month, pretending the war isn’t happening, is telling: he doesn’t know whose message to parrot yet. He’s calculating.

Before issuing a so-called opinion, grifters always look for public consensus, as well as authority figures they can suck up to. Their focus is on monetising the public’s reaction, not on being accurate or useful in real time. On this issue, the far-right is split into pieces.

While the Middle East is on fire, affecting the entire world economically, Gold focuses on a fringe theory linking autistic people to political extremism, seemingly in need of another group to target.

It’s odd that he still classes other people as far-right, as opposed to himself, given the recent screenshots you can see above, and his endorsement of Rupert Lowe, whose Restore Britain party is even more extreme than Reform.

Forget the economic depression likely to follow the destruction caused by the US and Israel. Forget the incoming oil crisis, the environmental disaster, the other horrors Trump is causing across the world, like his blockade on Cuba. This is Gold’s preoccupation today:

The free speech advocate wants people fired over speech

We have long become accustomed to people who bellow that free speech is the bedrock of civilisation and must be defended at all cost, to then turn around and sue or threaten to sue for defamation, when being portrayed unflatteringly. They include figures like Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Nigel Farage. Their hypocrisy shouts louder than they do.

A far larger category embraces free speech absolutism, yet in practice, only for viewpoints it agrees with (however extreme), arguing detractors should be fired for their offensive opinions. Offensive to them, that is. Even as a rhetorical device. Remember cancel culture?

Gold, who cheered for Israel’s genocide in Gaza all throughout, and still does, suddenly became a delicate flower when someone failed to show empathy for Charlie Kirk’s death. He should lose his job over this, Gold reckoned. Free speech was subject to nuance now. Moral considerations. Offence.

Hysterical incitement against Muslims

Contrary to how this looks, Andrew Gold didn’t need to be on drugs to post the following; the fake emotional dysregulation is common in far-right circles, since alarmism is their bread and butter:

Gold’s tone is reminiscent of the squirrel from Over The Hedge, when he pretended to have rabies:

Where do I start?

  1. He is turning 1.8 billion Muslims on this planet into a blob with the same views, attitudes, intentions etc. No consideration to the individual is given. When people do that to him for being Jewish, he certainly doesn’t appreciate it.
  2. Shabana Mahmood announced immigration reforms that seek to appease the far-right; reforms Gold is surely in agreement with, directly contradicting his initial take on her. She faces constant criticism from the left (rightfully so). In fact, she recently threatened to quit over this. Gold didn’t even wait to see what she intended to do; he saw red as soon as she was named, only because she was Muslim.
  3. By using the word “more”, he implies Hasidic Jews are somewhat (?) threatening to the UK. There is no indication of that, nor do they tend to run for office. He obviously doesn’t like them because they’re anti-Zionist and protest Zionism regularly, all over the world. They have their internal issues, as all strict religious communities do – but that doesn’t make them politically threatening.
  4. He clearly differentiates himself from Hasidic Jews, hence he acknowledges that within a religious group, there are multiple subdivisions with different views. He doesn’t give that courtesy to Muslims, although they are far more numerous, hence even more diverse.

In the video screenshotted above, Gold interviews a Qatari political figure, perhaps a fringe one, given the title and implications. An internet search reveals he is a billionaire with a preference for nationalist platforms. I doubt Gold knows or cares what this man’s agenda is – he’s willing to regurgitate British far-right talking points, so it doesn’t make a difference. Anyone will do. He would interview a bridge troll or a frog willing to use fascist buzzwords.

The “leftists are violent” trope

For the record, there haven’t been documented incidents of the type Gold claimed to fear (leftists smashing the windows of businesses owned by fascists; violence may occur at protests, but not in this manner). I don’t believe the following story is real, for reasons I will detail below, based on the mere use of logic.

If the story is real, the restaurant owner wanted Gold to promote him, and Gold eventually refused, even after having eaten there for free. The effort involved would’ve been a few clicks. A Tommy Robinson aficionado isn’t afraid to declare his mentality in public. Given that both he and the chef had taken photos with Gold, they could’ve posted them online themselves. So why deny the owner the online promotion? That would make Gold an arsehole. After the free meal, he gets to use the story and the owner gets nothing at all.

Gold platforms and promotes people with far-right views all the time. None of their windows get smashed in. Suddenly he’s too scared and paternalistic towards this fellow, to whom he denies promotion, even after insistence. Does this guy exist, or perhaps he just goes to a different school?

Big huge lodger scare (run for your lives!)

I have no idea if this is true or not, but if it is, I don’t see the problem. People rent out spare rooms all the time for extra cash. Would it make a difference if the government was paying said rent, instead of finding a lodger through local ads? This is something so stupid to get enraged over.

Incentivising you to mingle with people who perhaps don’t look like you and don’t speak the same native language. Never heard of! Student exchange programs never existed. Horrifying. They might even teach you to cook something alien. Complete soul erasure; straight to hell. If you’re willing to rent a room to a stranger, you’re taking the same risk, wherever they come from and whatever their race or religion. Your white, purely British lodger might be Ian Huntley.

For the US? Where ICE are terrorising cities, raiding workplaces, hospitals and churches, looking for immigrants? What is this man smoking? His own fumes, probably.

Palestinians are useless, worthless, hopeless in his opinion

Even students with scholarships at British universities. This fact alone does not convince him of their intelligence and talent, and chance of a bright future. Gold’s family immigrated to the UK. Let that sink in.

Hilarious, while Reform-led councils are a Greek tragedy

Gold is purely ideology and clique driven. He does not give half a turd about the wellbeing of his compatriots, locally or nationally. The election he references above was a small but significant win for the Green party. Their candidate, Hannah Spencer, was a young woman, plumber by profession and training to be a plasterer, which she has now achieved. A working class person, who gave one of the most inspiring maiden speeches, of solidarity with the working class and unity. It was truly moving and one rarely hears anything moving in Parliament. Hats off to her and hopefully, many more Green victories to come.

“Are we in trouble”? Over a local election being won by a working class young woman? Why?

As to Reform councils, if you want frequent and detailed information on their shenanigans, BowlerHatMan is a channel covering and archiving the goings-on. It’s trailer park meets psychology study. By default, people drawn to Reform, especially when seeking positions of authority, have toxic traits making them disagreeable. They are unable to cooperate even with fellow raging bigots. They bicker, their egos flare up, they quit their jobs in hissy fits and defect to Restore. The melodrama is never-ending. An entire reality show can be made based just on councils run by Reform.

Interesting audience poll; only roughly half would vote Reform

Truthfully, Reform are heading towards the ground faster than Musk’s exploding rockets. In a bid to go mainstream, Farage has opened the door to any Tory seeking to remain on the dancefloor, after having angered the population for 14 years with terrible austerity policies. Farage’s entire shtick had been about representing the common man, not entitled Eton boys of old, already sold to private and foreign interests.

Restore will split the fascist vote, hence many thanks, Mr Lowe, the live plastination experiment. A split vote is good news for the rest of us.

Grooming gangs are evil, only if they’re not white

To the far-right, bodily autonomy is always debatable, especially when it comes to women. The far-right is full of wife beaters, crusaders against MeToo and other specimens arguing that women belong in the kitchen, aside from producing white babies, to save the white race. Victims of grooming gangs are merely used by these specimens as a prop.

Here’s what happened when a grooming victim had the guts to speak at a far-right rally, reminding the crowd that the men who had abused her were white. They grabbed the microphone from her and manhandled her off the stage. This is how much they respect and care for women when they can’t use them for their agenda. This is a short version of the video.

Who spits on victims? These thugs do, and so does Gold, by supporting their outrage travesty.

Need I bring up the women and men raped by Israeli soldiers while in detention (often arbitrary)? There is even video evidence. Israel has thrown out charges against soldiers filmed raping a detainee. Gang rape is legal in Israel. You don’t hear him talking about it.

“Multiculturalism is evil“

According to Gold, political violence isn’t caused (heaven forbid) by other political violence or incitement; it’s caused by allowing different groups to coexist in the same society. Those others are born evil; they are simply subhuman and must be kept at bay by all means. Screw the actual causes of each violent event; screw individual responsibility.

This individual, by the way, has nothing against massacring innocent people, including children (as Israel does in neighbouring countries and all over Palestine), as long as they are not Jewish. His group must be protected; others can be erased from the face of the planet. Human life isn’t equal, he implies.

Gold defends street aggression against Muslims

The polite society he claims to dream of, where people aren’t aggressive in public, leaves out Muslims being targeted for intimidation by strangers in the street. He finds that perfectly excusable. There’s nothing wrong with the scenario described below, in his opinion.

Note the word “native population”. Mothin Ali was born and raised in Sheffield. Regarding religious garb, if anyone in Gold’s family is a practising Jew, their religious garb would be different than that of the majority in the UK. Some religious garbs are more equal than others.

The intentional use of WILL instead of WOULD is tantamount to incitement

In my humble opinion, of course. Gold has a large platform, which he (at least this once) used to affirm, as a statement of fact, that there will be civil war in the UK.

Gold provides entertainment – it’s never about the value or the urgency of the conversation

Finally, this individual will speak to anyone, provided people buy tickets. Popular issues and figures (not necessarily for the right reasons); if there’s enough interest to get arses in those seats, he’ll do it. It’s all about the spectacle.

He should read the room. The tide is turning. More and more people see through the far-right, if only by observing the consequences of Trump’s actions. The cult is getting smaller by the day.

He wanted broad appeal and a career that would span decades, I’m sure. Out of momentary greed, he painted himself into a corner, ending up with a dedicated but small and detested audience – neo-Nazis. The irony. It won’t last forever and he knows it.